> View this now

Published on: March 04, 2009
Type of content: ANALYST REPORT
Format: Unknown
Length: 14 pages
Price: FREE

Overview:
In Forrester's 79-criteria evaluation of requirements management tools vendors, five standalone requirements management tools and four application life-cycle management (ALM) solutions that include requirements management capabilities went head-to-head. Standalone tools fared better on average, but HP Quality Center ranked alongside IBM's Rational RequisitePro in the Leaders circle, and MKS's application life-cycle management solution joined standalone requirements management tools from Borland Software, Compuware, and Telelogic in the Strong Performers category. However, all three of our Contenders - Microsoft, Rally Software Development, and Serena Software - offer requirements management within a larger ALM solution. The availability of mature requirements management capabilities within larger ALM solutions complicates application development organizations' tool-selection process.

This research paper breaks down all the details to allow you to get a complete understanding of how each standalone requirements management tool and application life-cycle management (ALM) solutions fared.